Form 8-K
 
 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 12, 2010

AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         
Delaware   001-33497   71-0869350
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)   (Commission File Number)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
     
6 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ
  08512
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (609) 662-2000

 
 
(Former name or former address if changed since last report.)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 
 

 

1


 

Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.

The senior management of Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is using the presentation attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report in its current meetings with investors and analysts. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished pursuant to Item 7.01 and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d) Exhibits: The Exhibit Index annexed hereto is incorporated herein by reference.

 

2


 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Date: May 12, 2010

By: /s/ Geoffrey P. Gilmore                      
Geoffrey P. Gilmore
Senior Vice President and General Counsel

 

3


 

EXHIBIT INDEX

     
Exhibit No.   Description
99.1
  Presentation Materials

 

4

Exhibit 99.1

Exhibit 99.1

Corporate Presentation May 2010


 

Safe Harbor This presentation contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 relating to the business, operations and financial condition of Amicus, including but not limited to preclinical and clinical development of Amicus' candidate drug products, the timing and reporting of results from preclinical studies and clinical trials evaluating Amicus' candidate drug products, business development opportunities, and the projected cash position for the Company. Words such as, but not limited to, "look forward to," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "likely," "should" and "could," and similar expressions or words, identify forward- looking statements. Although Amicus believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that its expectations will be realized. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in Amicus' forward looking statements due to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the "Risk Factors" described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Amicus does not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which any such statement is made, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.


 

Amicus Therapeutics Overview Shares outstanding: As of March 31, 2010 27.6 million Price per share: As of May 10, 2010 $3.01 Market Cap: $68 million Cash Position: As of March 31, 2010 $81.4 2010 expected burn: $40-50 million Pioneer in development of pharmacological chaperone technology Focused on rare diseases and CNS diseases Lead program Amigal in Phase 3 for Fabry disease


 

AT2220 Alzheimer's Disease Pipeline Building meaningful rare disease and CNS franchises Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AmigalTM Fabry Disease Pompe Disease ERT Combo Therapy ERT Combo Therapy Alzheimer's Disease Monotherapy PliceraTM Gaucher Disease ERT Combo Therapy Parkinson's Disease Expected Key Events Complete enrollment US Ph3 Q410; Results mid-2011 Initiate EU Ph3 2H10 Initiate Amigal-ERT Phase 2 Study 2H10 Plicera-ERT Combo preclinical POC data 2H10 Advanced POC data and IND candidate selection 2H10 Target assessment and initial POC data 2H10


 

RARE DISEASE FRANCHISE AmigalTM for Fabry Disease


 

Amigal for Fabry Disease Phase 3 program is our number one strategic priority Phase 2 and Phase 2 extension data suggest promising Phase 3 outcome Specific entry criteria to enrich study populations for Phase 3 Clear path to registration through agreement with FDA Confident in likelihood of successful US registration trial


 

Study Design 6 month trial length Placebo-controlled N=60; ~40 sites globally Patient Population Naive to ERT or off ERT > 6 months Responsive mutation Elevated urine GL-3 Primary Endpoint Kidney interstitial capillary GL-3 at 6 months Secondary Endpoints Urine GL-3, GFR, 24-hour urine protein, safety and tolerability Status First patient dosed Q4 09 Expect to complete enrollment Q4 2010 Results expected mid-2011 Amigal for Fabry Disease US registration trial (Study 011) designed for success


 

Amigal for Fabry Disease Positive Phase 2 results 26 subjects treated for 12-24 weeks Amigal was generally well tolerated Treatment increased levels of ^-Gal A Treatment decreased levels of kidney GL-3 23 subjects entered voluntary long-term extension study Phase 2 responders would meet Phase 3 entry criteria Phase 2 26 Subjects (17 M / 9 F) 19 Responders (14 M / 5 F) 11 Kidney Biopsy (6 M / 5 F)


 

Amigal Increases Level of Target Enzyme Note: Males only; Mean and standard error; Responders have mutations eligible for Phase 3 Preliminary Data Responders (n=14) Non-Responders (n=3) 4-5 fold increase 0-2 fold increase Similar increases also observed in kidney and skin


 

- -65% N/A Male Responders 5/5 elevated at baseline 5/5 demonstrated a reduction Median 65% reduction Note: M = missing sample or cells not present; % represents change from baseline to last timepoint Amigal Decreases Kidney Interstitial Capillary GL-3 - -20% - -60% - -95% - -100% Female Responders 5/5 elevated at baseline 5/5 demonstrated a reduction Median 65% reduction Lower baseline levels due to X-linked nature of disease Preliminary Data


 

Note: LOCF is last observation carried forward; Responders have mutations eligible for Ph3 5/9 7/10 Majority of Responders Met PE for Phase 3 ^50% Reduction in Kidney Interstitial Capillary GL-3 Preliminary Data Primary Endpoint Percentage of subjects with a ^50% Reduction in kidney interstitial capillary GL-3 Amigal versus Placebo


 

All Responders (n=17) Subset Responders on 150 mg QOD (n=7) Non-Responders (n=7) - -34% - -52% Amigal Decreases Urinary GL-3 Phase 3 secondary endpoint Note: Median and 25%, 75% quartiles presented; Fabrazyme Ph3 study reported a 23% reduction in urine GL-3 200% +106% Preliminary Data


 

Long-Term Phase 2 Extension Study Data presented in February 2010 Phase 2 extension study overview 23 of 26 subjects from original Phase 2 study enrolled Cumulative 70+ patient-years on Amigal 15 subjects on treatment for approximately 2-3 years 8 subjects on treatment for more than 3 years 19 subjects continue to be treated in Phase 2 extension study Safety Amigal generally well tolerated No drug-related serious adverse events Renal function evaluated by two measures Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) Proteinuria Results suggest potential clinical benefit in renal function Preliminary Data


 

The Rate of Change in eGFR is Comparable To Rates Reported in the Literature for ERT Mean (SD) annualized change in GFR or eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2/yr) No treatment ERT Amigal Study Branton, 2002 Schwart-ing, 2006 West, 2009 Germain, 2007 Breunig, 2006 West, 2009 Germain, 2007 Breunig, 2006 West, 2009 AT1001 Ph2, ALL AT1001 Ph2, R* N, yrs n=14, 4 yrs n=20, 1 yr n=54, 0.5 yrs n=10, 4.3 yrs n=6, 1.9 yrs n=22, 2.1 yrs n=42, 4.3 yrs n=9, 1.9 yrs n=58, 2.1 yrs n=16, 2.9 yrs n=12, 3.0 yrs Treatment none none none FAB FAB REP FAB FAB REP AT1001 AT1001 # With B-line Proteinuria ^1g N/A 4/20 (e) N/A 10/10 6/6 22/22 0/42 0/9 0/58 1/16 1/12 Mean BL GFR CRI onset 70 85 ~100 79 90** ~135 94 90** 91 91 Notes: Figure modified from West, 2009; West, Breunig and AT1001 data exclude hyperfiltrators;* R= responders with mutations eligible for Ph3 excluding 1 subject previously categorized as a non-responder, ** mean GFR for all subjects in West 2009 prior to ERT was 90 ml/min Preliminary Data


 

Responders Demonstrated a Trend Towards Reduced Proteinuria in Phase 2 Extension Note: Median and 25%, 75% quartiles presented; Excludes subjects with no baseline value; includes dose interruption period; One responder was LLOQ at baseline and after treatment 10/11 responders demonstrated a reduction Encouraging because ERT has not demonstrated a clear effect on proteinuria Percent Change in 24-hour Urine Protein from Baseline to Last Timepoint - -21% +38% Non-Responders (n=2) Responders (n=10) Preliminary Data


 

Amigal for Fabry Disease Significant commercial opportunity 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Other 26.46 168.84 395.01 815.22 1142.82 1351.98 1606.5 1810.62 1996.47 2171.12 2330.14 2486 2638.12 2795.08 2957.86 3122.52 3295.03 3468.84 3645.01 3827.92 Cannibalized 15.54 99.16 231.99 478.78 671.18 794.02 943.5 1063.38 1172.53 1287.88 1482.86 1743 2089.88 2470.92 2861.14 3200.48 3444.97 3659.16 3876.99 4124.08 Amigal Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 99 245 468 718 973 1183 1307 1404 1503 1624 Non-addressable mutations Fabry Patients Addressable mutations Amigal Monotherapy Fabry Market (2008) is $670MM+ with 18%+ CAGR (1) Sales and CAGR based on 2008 company 10Ks; (2) Future market growth extrapolated from JP Morgan, AG Edwards, SG Cowen and Credit Suisse projections through 2010


 

Amigal for Fabry Disease Phase 2 and Phase 2 extension data suggest promising Phase 3 outcome Enzyme levels increased GL-3 levels reduced Preliminary evidence of positive impact on renal function Excellent safety profile Physicians are keeping patients on therapy Study 012 for EU registration commencing 2H 2010 Important medical and business opportunity First oral treatment Established market We are confident in likelihood of successful Phase 3 program


 

RARE DISEASE FRANCHISE Chaperone-ERT Combo Therapy


 

Chaperone-ERT Combination Therapy Potential to significantly enhance ERT safety and efficacy Reduce loss of activity in the circulation Increase effectiveness of ERT Improve safety of ERT Decrease quantity of ERT with reduced infusion time and costs Status and next steps Preclinical proof-of-concept established in Fabry and Pompe Plan to initiate Phase 2 clinical study with Amigal and ERT in 2010 Evaluating options to advance programs in Pompe and Gaucher Expansion of PC technology strengthens rare disease franchise


 

Amigal Increases Fabrazyme(r) Stability Denaturation Time Course of Fabrazyme at pH=7.4 Fabrazyme alone Percent folded rh?-Gal (Fabrazyme) +- 10 ?M AT1001 at 37 °C + 10 ^M Amigal 0% 50% 100% 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (hrs) % Folded Fabrazyme


 

Amigal Increases Fabrazyme Tissue Uptake Skin Heart Kidney ?-Gal A Activity ?-Gal A Activity ?-Gal A Activity AT1001 (mg/kg) AT1001 (mg/kg) AT1001 (mg/kg) Untreated 1 mg/kg Fabrazyme 12-wk old ?-Gal A deficient mice Single IV injection of Fabrazyme +/- oral AT1001 30 min before and 2 hrs after injection Tissue collected 7 days after Fabrazyme injection to measure rh?-Gal A activity n=7-8 mice/group; *p<0.05 vs. untreated and #p<0.05 vs. rh?-Gal A alone, t-test


 

Amigal Increases GL-3 Clearance by Fabrazyme Skin Heart Kidney GL-3 (% untreated) GL-3 (% untreated) GL-3 (% untreated) AT1001 (mg/kg) AT1001 (mg/kg) AT1001 (mg/kg) Untreated 1 mg/kg Fabrazyme 12-wk old ?-Gal A deficient mice Single IV injection of Fabrazyme +/- oral AT1001 30 min before and 2 hrs after injection Tissue collected 7 days after Fabrazyme injection to measure rh?-Gal A activity n=7-8 mice/group; *p<0.05 vs. untreated and #p<0.05 vs. rh?-Gal A alone, t-test


 

Amigal for Fabry Disease Treatment options for all patients 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A 2006A 2007A 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Other 26.46 168.84 395.01 815.22 1142.82 1351.98 1606.5 1810.62 1996.47 2171.12 2330.14 2486 2638.12 2795.08 2957.86 3122.52 3295.03 3468.84 3645.01 3827.92 Cannibalized 15.54 99.16 231.99 478.78 671.18 794.02 943.5 1063.38 1172.53 1287.88 1482.86 1743 2089.88 2470.92 2861.14 3200.48 3444.97 3659.16 3876.99 4124.08 Amigal Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 99 245 468 718 973 1183 1307 1404 1503 1624 Non-addressable mutations Fabry Patients Addressable mutations Amigal Monotherapy Amigal-ERT Combo Therapy Fabry Market (2008) is $670MM+ with 18%+ CAGR Potential to treat entire patient population (1) Sales and CAGR based on 2008 company 10Ks; (2) Future market growth extrapolated from JP Morgan, AG Edwards, SG Cowen and Credit Suisse projections through 2010


 

CNS DISEASE FRANCHISE


 

Parkinson's Disease & Gaucher Disease An established genetic link Gaucher carriers have an estimated 5-fold increased risk for Parkinson's disease Multiple independent studies in different populations Mutations in the gene (GBA) now considered most common genetic risk factor for Parkinson's disease The New England Journal of Medicine N Engl J Med 2009;361:1651-61


 

Significant Advancements in Parkinson's Increasing Gcase leads to synuclein reduction Untreated PC-Treated Vehicle 3 weeks 15 weeks 15 weeks Synuclein Synuclein/NeuN Established proof-of-concept in Parkinson's animal models Prevention of synuclein in accumulation in the brain Improvements in behavioral characteristics and motor function


 

Alzheimer's Disease Program Pharmacological chaperone approach ^-amyloid and P-Tau are hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease Potential to use pharmacological chaperones to increase activity of target enzymes and decrease ^-amyloid and P-tau Apparent link between various lysosomal enzymes and accumulation of ^-amyloid and P-Tau deposits in the brain Proceedings of the National Academy of Science Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:8332-7


 

Amicus Therapeutics Focused on execution of Amigal Phase 3 program Investing in rare disease and CNS disease franchises Exploring multiple strategic partnership opportunities in rare and CNS disease franchises to build on financial strength Continue to build shareholder value in 2010


 

Corporate Presentation May 2010